<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fixing the Telecom train wreck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lancewiggs.com/2007/06/29/fixing-the-telecom-train-wreck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lancewiggs.com/2007/06/29/fixing-the-telecom-train-wreck/</link>
	<description>NZ Internet, Media and Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:24:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juha</title>
		<link>http://lancewiggs.com/2007/06/29/fixing-the-telecom-train-wreck/#comment-1809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 01:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lancewiggs.com/2007/06/29/fixing-the-telecom-train-wreck/#comment-1809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Telecom&#039;s successful moves are... two I think: the investment in the Southern Cross Cable and cutting costs by outsourcing network management to Alcatel. However, Telecom passed on a chance to buy the half of SCC that it doesn&#039;t own for some reason, and now Alcatel has them by the short and curlies because it runs both the fixed and mobile networks.

Apart from Ferrit and Australia, the 027 CDMA network is looking like a dubious investment now. What happened to all the plans to become a player in the content market, through IPTV and VoD? Who remembers Telecom&#039;s Video Shed in the Viaduct? Nothing came out of that. 

Telecom&#039;s focused on defending existing revenue streams, a strategy that&#039;s worked because it has no competition. I think the idea is now to move on from that to own the national infrastructure for others to rent out. Trouble is, that infrastructure is dated - where&#039;s the promised NGN? - so it&#039;s not exactly a great deal for anyone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Telecom&#8217;s successful moves are&#8230; two I think: the investment in the Southern Cross Cable and cutting costs by outsourcing network management to Alcatel. However, Telecom passed on a chance to buy the half of SCC that it doesn&#8217;t own for some reason, and now Alcatel has them by the short and curlies because it runs both the fixed and mobile networks.</p>
<p>Apart from Ferrit and Australia, the 027 CDMA network is looking like a dubious investment now. What happened to all the plans to become a player in the content market, through IPTV and VoD? Who remembers Telecom&#8217;s Video Shed in the Viaduct? Nothing came out of that. </p>
<p>Telecom&#8217;s focused on defending existing revenue streams, a strategy that&#8217;s worked because it has no competition. I think the idea is now to move on from that to own the national infrastructure for others to rent out. Trouble is, that infrastructure is dated &#8211; where&#8217;s the promised NGN? &#8211; so it&#8217;s not exactly a great deal for anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

