<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Please don&#8217;t bail out GM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lancewiggs.com/2008/11/18/please-dont-bail-out-gm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lancewiggs.com/2008/11/18/please-dont-bail-out-gm/</link>
	<description>NZ Internet, Media and Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:02:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: En Avant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vista Group on US Auto</title>
		<link>http://lancewiggs.com/2008/11/18/please-dont-bail-out-gm/#comment-11513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[En Avant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vista Group on US Auto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elevatorfactoids.wordpress.com/?p=1201#comment-11513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I, being somewhat cynical about the industry&#8217;s failed makeover attempts over the last 30 years, argued that Chapter 7 administration (ie. send in the receivers) is the only way to achieve the required level of change, effectively breaking up these giant companiues into more nimble businesses, because they won&#8217;t do it to themselves. I&#8217;m not alone in this; Lance Wiggs has expressed similar sentiments. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I, being somewhat cynical about the industry&#8217;s failed makeover attempts over the last 30 years, argued that Chapter 7 administration (ie. send in the receivers) is the only way to achieve the required level of change, effectively breaking up these giant companiues into more nimble businesses, because they won&#8217;t do it to themselves. I&#8217;m not alone in this; Lance Wiggs has expressed similar sentiments. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

