<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The media is no longer the message</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lancewiggs.com/2009/05/04/the-media-is-no-longer-the-message/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lancewiggs.com/2009/05/04/the-media-is-no-longer-the-message/</link>
	<description>NZ Internet, Media and Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:02:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lance</title>
		<link>http://lancewiggs.com/2009/05/04/the-media-is-no-longer-the-message/#comment-12395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lancewiggs.com/?p=1603#comment-12395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It will be quite the media empire when you do Bernard]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be quite the media empire when you do Bernard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Hickey</title>
		<link>http://lancewiggs.com/2009/05/04/the-media-is-no-longer-the-message/#comment-12394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernard Hickey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 23:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lancewiggs.com/?p=1603#comment-12394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great stuff Lance.
I need to work harder to bring you across from WSJ.com...
cheers
Bernard]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff Lance.<br />
I need to work harder to bring you across from WSJ.com&#8230;<br />
cheers<br />
Bernard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lance</title>
		<link>http://lancewiggs.com/2009/05/04/the-media-is-no-longer-the-message/#comment-12392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lancewiggs.com/?p=1603#comment-12392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rob - the $900k is $900 x $1000 cells, and the new news in this morning&#039;s NBR article was that this was for the filters only - labour is extra. Regardless, $900,00 or $5m is still chump change in this context.

Your comment though is in the wrong lace for some reason - I will try to move it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob &#8211; the $900k is $900 x $1000 cells, and the new news in this morning&#8217;s NBR article was that this was for the filters only &#8211; labour is extra. Regardless, $900,00 or $5m is still chump change in this context.</p>
<p>Your comment though is in the wrong lace for some reason &#8211; I will try to move it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://lancewiggs.com/2009/05/04/the-media-is-no-longer-the-message/#comment-12389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 13:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lancewiggs.com/?p=1603#comment-12389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where did you hear it was just 900k. I heard it would be at least 5 million, plus take a while to do. Normally the networks will share that cost, as interference is normal with that sort of technology, however it appears vodafone isn&#039;t willing to pay a cent, to install filters. Also installing filters on telecoms XT network will affect it&#039;s performance. I have heard that a lot of the problem is vodafone, as they have pushed their network too far, without proper investment. If they were using their hardware the way it was designed, and weren&#039;t pushing it past the maximum, they probably wouldn&#039;t have the issue.
I have a another vodafone story, and that is with Vodafone wanting to install a cell tower in an area that telecom has previous abandoned after public pressure. Apparently vodafone are going to go ahead anyway, even though the public have said they don&#039;t want a tower next door.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did you hear it was just 900k. I heard it would be at least 5 million, plus take a while to do. Normally the networks will share that cost, as interference is normal with that sort of technology, however it appears vodafone isn&#8217;t willing to pay a cent, to install filters. Also installing filters on telecoms XT network will affect it&#8217;s performance. I have heard that a lot of the problem is vodafone, as they have pushed their network too far, without proper investment. If they were using their hardware the way it was designed, and weren&#8217;t pushing it past the maximum, they probably wouldn&#8217;t have the issue.<br />
I have a another vodafone story, and that is with Vodafone wanting to install a cell tower in an area that telecom has previous abandoned after public pressure. Apparently vodafone are going to go ahead anyway, even though the public have said they don&#8217;t want a tower next door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lance</title>
		<link>http://lancewiggs.com/2009/05/04/the-media-is-no-longer-the-message/#comment-12376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 05:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lancewiggs.com/?p=1603#comment-12376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ironic indeed. If only I had an editor to remove such things. I believe I was going to refer to Ann Coulter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironic indeed. If only I had an editor to remove such things. I believe I was going to refer to Ann Coulter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuey</title>
		<link>http://lancewiggs.com/2009/05/04/the-media-is-no-longer-the-message/#comment-12375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 04:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lancewiggs.com/?p=1603#comment-12375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does the asterisk after trustworthiness.* refer to?

Did the small print get cut off?

Ironic that in a post about assessing credibility you should make such a mistake!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does the asterisk after trustworthiness.* refer to?</p>
<p>Did the small print get cut off?</p>
<p>Ironic that in a post about assessing credibility you should make such a mistake!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

