Instagram, value and hard work

iPhone (and now Android) photo app developer Instagram just announced that they sold for US$1 billion of Facebook stock and cash. They have no revenue model. The free app allows iPhone owners to take photos and use various filters to make them look archaic and so forth, and became the cool thing to do. The photos can be (and it seems are generally)  uploaded to Instagram.

The three things I take away from this are

  1. This is a bubble investment. While arguably Facebook can monetise the vast Instagram user base by more tightly integrating the users into Facebook, the simple fact is they will spend $1 billion on a company with no revenue and just 12 staff. That’s great for the founders and investors, but doesn’t bode well for Facebook investors who will be buying into a company that spends money so freely.
  2. The value can disappear very quickly. While Instagram, until today, was cool, the ownership by Facebook, presence of, I’m guessing, thousands of other photo application and fickleness of the hipster-led market means that their user-base could disappear within months. It happened to MySpace after News Corp took over, and it will happen to Instagram under Facebook unless they are very clever. For my part – I no longer find Instagram style photos cool. That reflects the general passing of the faded photo fad, but this acquisition sounds the death knell.
  3. Easy money makes a nice story, but it’s not the path to real wealth. That path is, aside from a very few lucky stories, always the result of years of hard work building a genuine business that creates value for end users that they are willing to pay for. Please let’s not take the Instagram lesson as being that we can make $1 billion by building an iPhone app – we cannot.

Published by Lance Wiggs


3 replies on “Instagram, value and hard work”

  1. Instagram has iterated (and scaled) impressively over the last year or two. Meanwhile, Facebook has been busy buying up design talent on a regular basis. So the acquisition makes sense on that level.

    Not for a billion dollars, though. Facebook must have identified Instagram as having the potential to become a serious alternative. (And/or that it was at risk of acquisition by a competitor with equally deep pockets. Okay, Google.) And that too makes sense; Instagram’s strength is its social/discovery element, not its dinky filters – although those were a novel incentive that helped grow their user base early on.


  2. Instagram has an Android app? Saweet! I’m off to go get me some Instagram.
    Wait – did I miss the point of this post?


  3. It’s proof that Facebook and its owners got rich too fast. Whoever made the decision no longer has a perspective on the value of money, but what’s a billion one way or another when you got dozens of them?


Comments are closed.