When I went to school over 30 years ago the norm was to walk, cycle or take public transport. Similarly a colleague I spoke to yesterday said that when he went to school in Tauranga 20 years that there were hundreds of bike racks at his school and it was hard to find a place to park his bike. And I talked last night to someone from Hawkes Bay, and when she went to primary school a little over 10 years ago cycling was the norm as well.
But there has been a dramatic shift to little children being dropped off by their mummies (that’s how we would have cruelly described it at school) over the last 20 years. And the result of the critical mass shifting is that it’s now deemed too dangerous for kids to cycle or walk to school. But a lot of that perceived or real danger is the very traffic caused by those car driving mummies.
It’s a vicious circle, exemplified by another conversation yesterday with someone who firstly talked about how she used to cycle in Auckland, then about how cycling in Auckland became too dangerous because of the cars and poor infrastructure, and then about how cyclists in Auckland are painful and dangerous when she drives her car. I struggled to get her to understand the causes and effects.
We need to break this circle of despair, and get people back onto the streets, walking and cycling. We are seeing this start in some cities, Wellington especially, and successes in Auckland with multi-use areas like Fort Lane and Elliot Street. The end game is that New Zealand has vibrant walkable, liveable cities, with incredible people-filled street life and places to live that attract and retain the best talent.
So it’s great to see the Greens today launched a cycling to school policy. It’s a clever start.
Firstly, it exists. I would like to see policies from the other parties about how they will create better people-centric cities, and how they will also remove a huge number of cars from the roads at rush hour.
Secondly it focuses on schools first. That’s cheaper, as the infrastructure will be in relatively simple residential areas, but it also allows for dramatic uptake rats as a school’s students switch en masse from cars to bikes and walking. I think the Greens policy needs to provide for more support to each school as they embark on the switch to walking and cycling, helping them, for example, work with council on the infrastructure plans and with rider instruction, education and campaigns to get parents and kids to switch to the new modes of transport.
Thirdly it is safer and smarter. Getting people out of cars and moving creates healthier lifestyles, lowering obesity rates and, rather interestingly, that little exercise in the morning increases capacity to learn. But this policy is also taking responsibility for delivering kids safely to school, and that means physically separating cyclists from cars on busy roads, cunning moves to create safe shared environments on suburban streets and the shift in driver attitudes that will come when over 1,000 kids cycle to one school.
The policy grants $50 million a year over four years for the schools and councils that grab it first. I’d like to see the early schools competing for the first round of funding, and a great deal of care, learning and experimentation taken with the initial roll out. If the programs in the first few schools work well, then the demand will naturally spread to other schools, and the funding needs to be available as it does.
Above all — I can’t wait for a future where the kids can take back the streets and hoon to school on bikes. It’s so much fun, and once it becomes cool again then who knows, maybe us adults will want to start walking and riding as well. At some stage, and please make it soon, we will have critical mass, and people around the world will start talking about our cities in revered tones.
So good for the Greens, and I look forward to the other parties responses.
It’s a great idea and as a cycling family we would love to implement it. School policy seems to detour this until most of the way through primary school.schools are catering to the lowest denominator instead of letting families make up their own minds.
It is not a matter of policy, Its about attitude. There seems to be a issue that kids might get molested or injured if they are not with their parents every waking moment. No policy wil change that. Time to toughen up, and have parents teach their kids to ride well, and to be safe walking, then leave them to get to school. If you are still fearful, then start a walking bus, lots of them round our way.
I have edited this to remove inflammatory comments and phrases
Fat lot of good any of it will do … when we … fine small kids for not wearing a helmet. I have seen them doing this around Mt Maunganui to holiday makers. … police force has …forced a restriction for powering electric bikes in limiting them to 300watts, which is barely enough power to drive a bike and adult up a small hill. What happens when one has a child onboard or pack of groceries?
It did make me wonder if the reason for kids not cycling to school (and to be honest, I see a LOT of them walking/scootering/riding around Howick, where I am) is because of the parents driving the other kids.
It gets dangerous to ride* because of the stupidly large SUVs driven by the other parents who think it’s unsafe for their kids to ride because of the stupidly large SUVs… etc.
good on the greens for starting this. I’m looking forward to cycling from soon-to-be-home to the ferry every morning….
* I dont think it is – maybe except in a few edge cases. Allow kids to ride on the pavement when they need to, if they feel unsafe.
I’ve noted vastly increasing numbers of ‘Daddies’ doing the old ‘stop, drop and roll’ outside the school gates, Lance but putting the slightly belittling monikers to one side, your point stands.
Parents need to be supported with safe, concrete options to develop their children’s independence in stages, and I’m in favour of any policy which assists with this. Walking school buses have been a fantastic start for smaller children, leading to safe solo walking, but they do require a parent to participate at least once a week which is not possible for all families with two working parents.
Once a child is old enough (whatever that is) to travel independently they need school support to store and retrieve their bikes/scooters.
However, our (decile 10, central suburbs) primary school doesn’t allow kids to bike or scooter to school. If they scoot, their poor parents, are required to carry the damn scooter home and then bring it back again after school. It’s nuts, and effectively means only the kids with at-home parents can scoot. Despite the generally poor pavement etiquette, I love the chattering flocks of kids whizzing down the pavements on their scooters when intermediate gets out.
Kids want to be independent. There’s nothing cooler. Please schools – let’s help them out!
That’s really sad that a school doesn’t let kids bike or scooter to school.
What the heck has changed? I walked to school from my second day – about a kilometre.
Doesn’t allow kids to scooter to school? What the hell, my local primary school has scooter racks outside the classrooms! No bike racks unfortunately, I often take my son the school on a trailer bike, and we just have to park it where we can.
Comments are closed.