Guilty – but what about the Police organisation?

The Policeman who turned to chase a motorcyclist on Buller gorge, blocking the road and causing two other motorcyclists to be seriously injured, has just been found guilty of dangerous driving causing injury.

He is no doubt haunted by the accident – as a professional officer policing road safety the decision to make a 3 point turn on a narrow, windy and 100kmph road was very poor.

My earlier post questioned whether road safety was a value for the police force, or whether detecting speeding came first. The maneuver was reckless for three reasons – he could not catch the bike anyway, the turn itself was dangerous – especially as bikers often ride together, and the attitude of “stop all speeding no matter what” was not putting common sense road safety ahead of the letter of the law.

“The first and foremost duty of everyone on the road it to ensure safety – that of ourselves and that of other drivers.”

However there is much more to this incident than one individual’s actions:

“There is a systematic safety culture failure that really scares me here.”

When there is a personal failure we should look beyond the actions of one person and question the organisation. I know very little about the inner workings of the NZ Police force, but I would hope that they now internally understand the circumstances that led to Anthony Dale Bridgman making that 3 point turn.

  • Was zero harm when traffic policing reinforced as the number one priority to all staff, no matter what else?
  • Was there a quick safety process to check whether a pursuit will be safe? (e.g. a grown ups version of stop, look listen. I like answering a quick “what could go wrong?“)
  • Was the police vehicle and driver training suitable for the roads?
  • Was the road safe enough?
  • Was motorcycling speeding on that road a road safety priority?
  • If slowing speeds on that road was a priority, then was there a safer way to do so?
  • ..and so on. There are structured processes for conducting this sort of review.

I will note that from what I have seen on the roads and in the newspapers the NZ Police force seems to generally understand this sort of stuff more than virtually any other police force I have seen – and I have ridden on roads in over 60 countries.

However I am very concerned that the way statistics are coded and interpreted in New Zealand means that there is an overemphasis on speeding and an under emphasis on road quality.

It’s easy to code “excessive speed”, but much harder to say “yet another lousy NZ road” when reporting an accident. The primary cause of this particular accident was the incorrect actions of an individual, but “lousy road” was very high up on the list of contributing factors, along with the other answers to the questions above.

<update>

From a new article on stuff:

investigating officer Detective Senior Sergeant Tony Bernards said the verdict was “satisfying”.

He believed the crash was an “aberration” and would not prompt regular officer training.

The police manual required officers to be prudent and competent drivers and not put other motorists at risk, he said.

“This was a very unusual event.

“There are many times a day when officers make the decision to turn and do not because it is unsafe.”

About Lance Wiggs

@lancewiggs
This entry was posted in Life and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Guilty – but what about the Police organisation?

  1. Ben says:

    Hear hear!

    The nz police is fucked. There are a lot of good individuals, but the organisation is a thuggish, thoughtless beast. But that’s just my take on it from the new officers and retired ones I know.

    Like

  2. hellonearthis says:

    Like

  3. Joe says:

    once again the motive of ‘revenue gouging’ rather than road safety is behind the culture of police policing on our roads. Despite all the evidence to the contrary the arsehole police system still proffers the line that speeding kills rather than the proven cause of ‘driver inattention’. Why? because speeding as a line/culture pays in fines and revenue. If we take the causes back even further we find the public policy prescription of right wing politics from the american instutes at work here. Public choice theory in particular is like the ancient demons of old in a new guise. Rodger Douglas and his crooked croonies introduced these policy initiatives into out caring society and immediately the death toll rose. Not only in law enforcement but across the board in many many welfare backstops that were ripped down, people just simply died. The power supply privitisation for instance resulted in some 1500 deaths of the elderly, sick, young, lame and insane in the first 5 years alone. This deprivation of access to the means of life has been replicated right across our society in foods, medicines, housing and welfare. The result has been the dis-banding of the once world-leading New Zealand welfare state which began under a Labour Government and dismantled further through by the right wing policy advocates of the tories. As an example of the power of public choice theory and even under Labours nine year tenure the minimum youth rate went up a solitary miserable one dollar! The co-rellation with these policies and the sever increase in the crime rate is axiomatic.
    The piggies are simply one of the many state run institutions that have at their core right-wing monetrist policies. In this case ‘revenue gouging’ through ticketing and fines. The piggy who committed this near-murder was simply following strict police policy guidelines and probably would at least have had a poor monthly revenue report done on him and at worst a top-level reprimand for not getting his tally of tickets for the revenue stream.

    Like

Comments are closed.