Lies and online dating….

“about 20 percent of online daters admit to deception. If you ask them how many other people are lying, however–an interviewing tactic that probably gets closer to the truth–that number jumps to 90 percent.”

So quotes an interesting Scientific American article on online dating. (via here)

My experience was that people do lie, though I really cannot explain why. The lies I caught in my online dating escapades included presence of children (profile said no, but she said yes) and two egregious photo lies (where I could not reconcile the profile photo with the individuals I met). Given that I only met about 10 folk through online dating, that’s a 30% bad-lies rate. scary.

“online height is exaggerated by only an inch or so for both men and women but that women appear to understate their weight more and more as they get older: by five pounds when they are in their 20s, 17 pounds in their 30s and 19 pounds in their 40s.”……….”..the shorter and heavier people are, the bigger the lies..”

[19 pounds = 8.6 Kg, which is decidingly non-trivial]

I wouldn’t think of cheating on height – it is too measurable – but it turns out that this is a big parameter for women searching for men. Weight is the huge parameter for men searching for women, and leaving it blank means than men will assume the candidate has portly dimensions.

Age appears be be faked a lot as well – with spikes at suspicious ages like 29, 35 and 44 in the US. With 40 looming for me perhaps it’s time for a re-assessment of my birth-date? But then who would want to start a relationship based on a foundation of lies?

Overall, lying on your online dating profile may make you receive more responses, and may make you initially feel better. But it sure as anything will not help you find “the one” – the one person that actually likes the way you are (short, fat, ugly in your eyes is petite, cute and beautiful in your beaus). I’m a huge fan of honesty in dating profiles, both in what you are and what you want. I’d rather receive a handful of replies from women that fit my uniquely personal and somewhat daunting criteria than 100’s of replies to a fake profile.

I’ll go out on a limb here – I’d guess that in NZ FindSomeone profiles are far far less likely to be fake than those of competitor NZDating. I’d also guess that paid profiles (“Gold Members”) are the most unlikely to be fake, and the higher the fees the higher the integrity.

Now – if somebody could just do the research to back this up…..

Yahoo! Pipes

Rowan started this one – here’s this blog’s RSS feed  in French, courtesy of the new coolness – Yahoo! Pipes. It helps that I’m in France and so can of course completely understand all of the perfectly translated output. (What’s with the French thing today – first Fronde, now this….)

You can even subscribe to the Frenchified feed in a variety of ways – including RSS, Google, MyYaho0!, bloglines and, amazing they still exist, AOL…

Pipes will be awesome when they add a bunch more inputs and operators.  I hope Yahoo! keeps taking an agnostic approach to sources – Flickr is there but that is owned by Yahoo!, Altavista Babelfish is there, but that is owned by Yahoo! as well. However Google Base (which is pretty useless right now in NZ) is also there, which bodes well.

Here’s a slightly more complicated Pipe – 3 sources 2 from Flickr and a motorcycle blog. It shows the latest Motorcycle adventure pictures, with a failed attempt to filter to location = Argentina and Wellington. It also has the most recent blog entries from a generic motorcycle blog.

Synergy is now Fronde

I understand the need for Synergy to change their name – Synergy is a pretty generic word and in use by companies is pretty much every other country. Fronde is a French word meaning Sling, and the revolutionaries that are described using the word were, how do I put this, strongly anti-government….

Here’s a nice quote from the Wiki link above:

” The term frondeur was later used to refer to anyone who suggested that the power of the king should be limited, and has now passed into normal French usage to refer to anyone who will show insubordination or engage in criticism of the powers in place.”

It’s nice to shake the status quo, but let’s hope that Synergy/Fronde is referring to their competitors rather than their public sector customers….

Another quote from the One True Wiki:

“Thenceforward the Fronde becomes a story of sordid intrigues and half-hearted warfare, losing all trace of its first constitutional phase.”

It also seems that one Frondeurs army was defeated when it’s enemy noticed that the army was in a state of disarray as 2 factions jostled over who was senior to who and who should stand where.

Let’s hope this isn’t the path that Synergy/Fronde follows..

Microsoft, Privacy and Kiwi Police

Very interesting situation where Microsoft refused to deal with a police request because they are “a foreign company and not subject to NZ laws”. What terrible PR. And what hogwash.

NZ privacy laws are a lot stronger than the US laws, especially when it comes to trading information between businesses. But when the NZ Police call on a criminal matter companies are expected to react and react quickly. Microsoft hid behind some dubious lawyering and so got themselves some negative press, while the offender was caught through other means anyway.

NZ is such a small place that companies can have a trust-based relationship helping the police catch criminals, without giving away irrelevant details of other customers. The US enforcement agencies appear to take a ham-fisted approach, through the beleaguered but not really dead Carnivore and the like. Hopefully Microsoft will learn from this episode.

Future of Newspaper industry

Here’s an answer to a question I posted a little while back in Linked-In while playing with their new questions and answers feature. It was rated ‘good answer’ by the questioner, whatever that means.

Question

Future of the Newspaper Industry?
How long will the newspaper business continue as it is today? Circulation has been decreasing in every major metro area within the U.S. (at least) for the last 15 years. When does the circulation drop below a point where the editorial, classifieds, and advertising models collapse and our vehicle news needs radical innovation? Perhaps this innovation already exists with RSS, blogging, and online news search and alerts – but it seems to me just the beginning. I think it more likely that trends in citizen journalism, multi-user editorial, effective content targetting will need to grow to create sufficient online news capabilities.

My answer
1: Newspapers on newsprint are just a delivery mechanism for the content and advertising. The eventual endgame is clear – it’s clearly more efficient to deliver content electronically than through a process involving trees, big industrial plants to make and print on paper, and transportation/distribution to shift the same.

2: Several niches will survive for longer, and even prosper. These include newspapers aimed at: older people, commuters, niche content markets (economist, WSJ), papers of record (NYTimes, WSJ), communities and poorer regions and economies. I’m unsure of the reaction of highbrow (Times) versus lowbrow (Sun), but there is bound to be one.

3: Newspaper companies will scramble to retain their customers online, and most will probably make it. Incumbents need to be already invested online, and not just in the content game if they can. The big newspapers (NYTimes etc.) will capture an increasing share of the general news, so other’s will need to focus on local news (and advertising) and syndicate the rest – perhaps through more direct partnerships. The big online disrupters, such as eBay and Google, have been working from the back of the newspaper to the front, and newspapers risk losing it all if they do not get their online revenue models working.

The endgame is a combination of the best features on on and offline – e.g. I should expect to read excerpts from my favorite and relevant blogs in my newspaper today, so that the experience between on and offline is seamless. Eventually I expect my newsprint newspaper to be some sort of robust automatically updating product that I can carry around with with me, yet still read at the size of my choice – from full size newspaper on the kitchen table to a paperback novel size while standing in the train. How long will this take? Technology-wise I’d say within 5 years, but society will take perhaps another 5 for the complete shift.

Other answers

Other points raised were manifold – some interesting ones were

– The  largest USA papers are small internationally – biggest USA Today is only #13 globally, & just 8 out of the top 100 are from the USA. The top 5 are all from Japan.

– People don’t want (or need) to pay for news any more.

– Nothing beats a Sunday paper to read in the sun, or a commuter paper to read on the train.

– Radio or TV didn’t kill newspapers – why should online?

eBay listings fall in some categories

Interesting eBay UK has seen some category’s weekly listings fall year on year, sometimes dramatically. Good summary here, which refers to this, who got it from the Bear Stearns eBay report.

The biggest falls were in media – DVD’s and music seeing 15% and 26% drops – hence the recent price changes.

Even eBay.com saw some reversals, with Collectibles down 1%,  Pottery and Glass down 6% and Real Estate down 1%. Of course these are only weekly stats, so I would not read too deeply into the actual numbers, but it is showing that growth in some categories has reached it’s limit.  These are the categories that had the highest early growth (including Dolls and Bears)  so you would expect them to be saturated first.

Overall weekly y/y growth is 10% for eBay UK and just 8% for eBay USA – that’s disturbingly ‘normal’…

Scarcity in sport

Great comment from the economist blog – American Football is much more profitable (and popular) than NBA & Baseball because of the scarcity of the games. It’s true – the season is relatively short, the build up is to one event only, and the popularity of the Superbowl is undimished.

Those that are foisting more and more Rugby games on us could learn from the mistakes of Baseball and the success of American Football. Less is more.

These days All Black tests are not such important events, the Super 14 is tediously long and combined with the NPC the NZ Rugby season lasts all year. Less is more indeed.

Private Equity in NZ

NZHerald has a piece on private equity (PE). Several things stand out. Firstly there are apparently no NZ based PE funds looking for investors at the moment, secondly you can apparently get into PE with $10-20k and thirdly PE will get you returns of 20-30% per year.

There may well be funds being raised – but it may not be public knowledge. Given the porousness of the scene NZ business I would be surprised though if this were not true. There is room for a big smart fund though.

Any private equity fund accepting $10-20,000 investments is going to be spending too much time and money on attracting and handholding investors and not enough time on investing.  The ideal fund has a handful of big, long term investors and that is it.

The example given, Pohutukawa Fund (PF), is not a good one. It actually really isn’t a private equity fund, as the shares are tradeable. I would think of PF as an investment company – much like a junior version of Infratil. PF had 1750 investors and raised $53m – that’s just over $30,000 average investment, which is a lot to look after. Meanwhile, in the 2 years and 3 months since the fund closed, they have invested in a total of just 5 businesses, and committed 10% of their capital to another fund. Only $13.3m of the $53m was invested by November 30 2006. Indeed PF took until July 2005 to make their first investment, and many of them appear to be in Australia. This is far too slow in a market this sleepy, and the fund of fund structure seems unwieldy and expensive.

Let’s look at that 20-30% return number. Private Equity returns in the USA have been really impressive over the years, but recently the amount of money flowing there has meant depressed returns for all but the best funds. Funds are now looking at international markets to get returns – hence the sudden interest in little old NZ by the likes of TPG. However those great US based funds are closed to ordinary investors. My former Professor  Dave Swensen from Yale’s endowment may get a look-in at a new fund raised by KKR if he wanted (he probably wouldn’t), but even NZ’s wealthiest individuals would find it extremely difficult to invest in the likes of Sutter Hill, Carlye Group, TPG and other big Hedge /PE firms. Meanwhile the smaller and less established firms are really struggling as there is too much money chasing to few deals.

That said there should easily be 20-30% returns waiting to be realised in the NZ market, which has been neglected. What is needed is smart local players with big pockets and aggressive attitudes. The next 2 years should be interesting as the international players enter and the locals react.

Wishbone

Great little success story from Wishbone. $10m turnover, 100 employees,  13 stores, great supermarket distribution and, most importantly, a great product. (Terrible, out of date, single page website though)

Their business model is interesting – they manufacture yummy ready to cook food, and sell it through 3 channels – supermarkets, takeaway stores (either ready to eat or microwave it yourself) and now in a sit-down restaurant. Soon they will also market directly through eCommerce and export. I particularly like their Wellington airport store.

I’d guess (hope?) they have seperated the two business lines’ P&L’s – one focusing on providing great dishes that are in demand and delivered at low cost, and the other focusing on shifting as many of those dishes at optimised margins.

The nice thing about this model is that it removes much of the production planning problem, which is painful with (semi) fresh food. If one outlet (say the restaurant) is running low on dinners then more can be (made and) delivered from the central kitchens. Similarly if there is overstock at one place then some products can be redirected to other channels and planned production scaled back.

The risk they have is the increased managment overhead of too many distribution channels, which will blow out the number of staff, overheads and capex required. They are looking for investors – but if I was them I’d initially stay lean, deliver on the relatively cheap online/phone solution, then go for exports with local (i.e. foreign) J.V. partners.

Well done to founders Andrea Gibson Scarlett and Shayne Scarlett.

Yellowlife

Yellow pages launched Yellowlife, which will spam you with advertisers junk if you register big life events with them. (marriage etc.). Sorry – it’s a tool to help you plan big events.

It’s a good idea in principle, and it is good to see a new site laucnhed. I do have three issues though…

1: I would not Telecom with any more of my personal details than I absolutely have to give. Telecom have a poor ‘brand’, but to be fair there really isn’t any institution that I would trust.

2: The site takes forever to load. Actually I had to refresh the homepage url 3 times before it would load, and one click from there gave me this: (then I gave up)

(my local Internet network is just fine thanks – I’m in France, not on XTRA)

3: Their advertising placement leaves something to be desired – should they really be associating with dodgy bittorrent sites? (The site below wanted to drop something horrid on my PC – lucky I have a mac.)

More leaks than a…

So much for confidentiality – Most if not all of the Yellow Pages bidders have been identified
by three(!) insiders. At least 9 companies are bidding, apparently, and KKR, CCMP Capital Asia, Pacific Equity Partners, Carlyle, Bain Capital, Providence Equity Partners, CVC Capital and TPG are eight Private Equity firms interested along with Sensis – Telstra’s directory unit.

Goldman Sachs is earning their fees – letting everyone know there is lots of interest will magnify the auction effect and raise the final price. But this is wholesale leaking of (most likely) confidential information, and it seems somewhat ethically challenging. It makes NZ seem like a gossiping backwater. I wonder whether the bidders knew their presence would be announced?

US Politics via Harry Potter..

For those who don’t share my passion for US politics (which I try to keep out of this blog) here’s one way to think of the status quo:

 “Dick Cheney is Lord Voldemort. George W. Bush is Peter Pettigrew.” Don Rumsfeld is Lucius Malfoy, while Cornelius Fudge represents administration supporters who deny that anything is wrong. ….“Daily Prophet reporter Rita Skeeter is Fox News.”

This was taken from a reader comment on a blog by New York Times columnist Nick Kristoff. So 1: the NYTimes gave the columnists’ blogs, 2: Nick is actually actively using it and 3: people are responding to it. It’s not as big as it could be as the blog (like Nick’s articles) are behind the infuriating Times Select subscription wall. I begrudgingly pay the fee to see Kristoff and Krugman among others, but the result of Times Select has been a sharp drop-off in the relevance of the excellent NYTimes columnists.